Shortlink: http://wp.me/p3nYC8-106
October 2017 Updated May 15 2018 – This will be sort of a table of contents or index to assist you in finding what blog contains what information.
These are not precise guides to the organization of each Blog, but key phrases to give you an idea of what is discussed in each blog.
Introduction to the Sovereign Citizen Concept
(There is no such thing in our Legal Tradition)
What is Sovereignty?
We The People or I The Person?
What’s Wrong With Individual Sovereignty?
What Do Courts Say?
Sovereign Citizens and the Jurisdictional Gambit:
You Can’t Touch Me! (23 Misquoted Cases)
https://wp.me/p3nYC8-1q5
But The Courts Do NOT agree
( Also See Compendium of Cases )
.
Claimed: “Common Law” is the Supreme Law of the Land
Claimed: “Rules, Regulations, Statutes are Not Legal or
Only Govern the Government not The People
Response: What is the law?
Response: The Rule of Law — More Than Just A Rule
.
Sources of Law:
The Constitution
The State Constitutions
Statutory Law (Statutes, Ordinances, Codes)
Case Law (AKA Common Law)
Not a Source of Law:
Natural Law
Rules and Regulations
Are Statutes Laws? What About Regulations ?
http://wp.me/p3nYC8-Od
Statutes — are they laws?
Response: Latin Had ONLY Capitals!
= The US and the States =
(Or If You Prefer, It Can Be An Elephant )
http://wp.me/p3nYC8-fK
.
created a corporation from the beginning.
Claimed: In 1871 The Congress created a commercial charter/Constitution
for the US, and made us into a corporation headquartered in the
District of Columbia, not a nation & therefore…
The Constitution used now is not the same one adopted in 1791.
CAPITALIZATION Did Not Happen!
Where’s the New Constitution?
Constitution FOR vs Constitution OF
Where is the corporation called THE UNITED STATES?
The Constitution refers to itself as “The Constitution of the United States”
The Adjournment of 1861
Claimed: The Congress of 1861 adjourned and was dissolved
and all acts of Congress thereafter are invalid.
Response: “the President …may, on extraordinary occasions,
convene both Houses, or either of them”) and the Constitution
does not allow Congress to not exist.
.
Claimed: 28 USC 3002 proves the US is a corporation
Response: (Talk About Word Salad and Mr Magoo Legal Research!)
..
Federal Zone Theory
Claimed: The US government only has authority over
Federal Lands and Possessions
(Except for Article IV Sec 3 …)
Claimed:
(1) US is bankrupt;
(2) So the states lost sovereign power
(3) The U.S. lost its sovereignty
(4) US Became a corporation (or already was)
(5) Your relationship with corporations contractual only.
(6) Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) controls it all.
Response: None of that is true, logical, or supported by any
precedent or historical fact.
.
The “Traficant Speech”
Former Congressman and Federal Convict James Trafficant speaks
(With Interspersed Rebuttals)
.
Response: What IS the UCC?
What It’s NOT
UCC started 1952 not 1933
Not a Federal law.
Not a Law unless adopted in your state.
Some States did not adopt it.
Some made changes so it’s not really “Uniform”
Applies only to businesses and commercial activity
If States are not sovereign how can they pass laws like…the UCC?
.
Claimed:
(1) We lost the Revolution
(2) We won but we gave up what we won
(3) War of 1812 was British attempt to stop the “13th Amendment ”
(4) Because the South lost the Civil War we don’t own anything, and all our taxes go to the King.
Response: You want me to respond to THAT?? (OK I did…)
Claimed: There are Actually Three United States
Response:Learn to Read…there are three significant things you
can use those words to mean.
.
= The Courts =.
Does The “Real” 13th Amendment Eliminate the Courts?
http://wp.me/p3nYC8-kI
-
-
-
-
- “Esquire” is Neither a Title of Honor Nor of Nobility.
- There is no law that gives the title “Esquire” to a lawyer, it’s just a fading tradition.
- If there was such a law and Esquire was a title, and the Amendment actually applied, the law granting the title would be unconstitutional under this amendment, so the title would not actually be granted, so no one would lose citizenship.
- The title not only doesn’t come from government or anyone really, it also it does not come from a foreign power so the Amendment wouldn’t apply.
- Not Enough States Ratified – Publication is not Ratification
-
-
-
What about the BAR??
Claimed: “The Admiralty Courts Exist Because
the U.S. is Under Martial Law”
Response:
The U.S. Is NOT Under Martial Law
Martial Law Does Not Suspend the Courts
The Courts are Not Suspended,
The Courts are not Acting in any Admiralty or Military Capacity.
Does The Jones Act Put Us Under Maritime/Admiralty Law
By Our Birth Certificate?
Why Is Your Name Spelled In CAPITALS?
.
The Currency Proposition:
Claimed: The US No Longer circulates Gold and Silver
Based Currency and/or Coin, Therefore We Are Governed by The Law Of The Sea .
Response: Huh?
The Flag Fringe Proposition:
Claimed: The Gold Fringe on the Flag Shows
That The Court is An Admiralty/Military Court
Response: The Courts Say That is Hogwash
(and the wash part is not a reference to the sea.)
.
.
Are You A Person?
“But I saw a video where the cops let this guy go…”
.
.
= Other Relevant Sources =
A Legal Response to the Sovereign Citizen Movement
A 2019 Law Review Article
Montana Law Review, Vol. 80 [2019], Iss. 2, Art. 2
Common-Sense Responses to Radical Practices:
Stifling Sovereign Citizens in Connecticut
Sovereign Citizens in South Carolina
Who They Are and How Do We Deal With Them
A reasonably short and readable article that describes beliefs
and tactics that are widespread among sovereigns
The “Missing Thirteenth Amendment”:
Constitutional Nonsense and Titles of Nobility”
Philip Marks 
Ok… so lets get one thing straight, what the phuck is a “Sovereign citizen”??[See my reply to your other comment] Does anyone not realize that is an oxymoronic classification?? There is no such thing…. half of what ive read sounds like glow in the dark ABC bureau shilling some ol’ -I talk like a [DELETED HOMOPHOBIC SLUR], and my shits all retarded- ass trash… first off… there is [ARE] no questionable parameters of the federal government they are delegated their Constitunal authority to exist and operate… in their 10mi.² of D.C. and territories…. they are foriegn to the several Republic states of the Union…
No they are not the courts are absolutely clear that’s rubbish and equally clear is the constitution which gives the federal government nationwide areas of sovereign power actually in the several states because we have a system of dual sovereignty where the Federal Government has jurisdiction over certain topics of sovereign power…
… a large and very heavy veil has been draped upon you [Look in your mirror to see that] and are shilled the contrary! Everything that is deals with whats Public whats Private… whats the contract to you willfully bound yourself to that subjects you to the Article 1 maritime/admiralty jurisdiction …
The answer to that nonsense is in Article III where the jurisdiction explicitly goes way beyond admiralty which you don’t understand at all anyway and your grasp of the law is as nonsensical as any sovereign’s. You don’t willingly bind yourself to the law you are bound period we are all subject to the law period. We don’t contract and it’s not voluntary which would be btw an insane way to run a society
… they are trying you under?… dont be illiterate
Please learn to use English words in their accepted meaning, I’m pretty sure you are not illiterate and i sure as hell am not.
and so easily allow yourself to be shilled contrary to the truth
[As imagined by fellow travelers of the sovereigns? Like yourself? Get a mirror Dorothy we are not in oz any more. I am not easily shilled i spent years reading the sources and the many insane legal fantasies such as those you are purveying in this comment, and researched them deeply and my blogs are all documentaries with linked sources so anyone can verify that what i say is accurate in context. You have no sources at all and no court recognizes any of this preposterous bullshit. Thanks for your time.]
And your fantasies along that line are no different. Constitutional law does not recognize your artificial distinction of the Federal jurisdiction and I’ve addressed it at great length in my blogs so phuk off please.
Ot are you just rolling factitious shit intentionally?
Factitious or fictitious? Everything in my blog that is offered as fact is fact. Linked to my sources in the blog. You can verify that every thing I said came from a place that I am not afraid to show you, in context.
The sovereign bullshit is hard because there is no standard theory, it’s all made up; so it sometimes clashes with itself and then the people writing this crap are just cut/paste to the point the even a misspelled word will appear on many many sites.
Anticipating your other comment, there is no such thing in reality as a sovereign citizen and the term is indeed oxymoronic. But if it isn’t clear from the blog I’ll summarize. A sovereign citizen is a person who believes they are sovereign over themselves and no one is sovereign over them, that they alone can decide what laws apply to them or how they are bound. And BTW you are saying the same damn thing with variations. It’s not contract law it’s LAW and you personally have NO CHOICE as to whether it applies to you though you can very much spend your life in prison for exercising that lunatic idea.
They (you) have a bewildering flurry of proof to offer and even more legal theories than there are sovereigns to butrress this fantastical idea (of which yours is one) and even when they find themselves in jail or prison for practicing this fantasy they cannot seem to reattach to reality. Get some real glue maybe it will help.